Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Hubbard's avatar

I think there is also a degree of differences in reporting?

When my kid was younger, we had the spreadsheet fight about hours, and we basically came to the conclusion that we had a 50/50 time split once we were using the same assumptions about what counted as 'child care' and what didn't. Some of this was dumb stuff, like 'playing video games with the kid' was something she did not want to count as 'childcare,' but she did want 'playing dolls with the kid' counted on her side. There was also kind of a divide, wherein 'housework' was counted, but yardwork or garage work was not. But it was extremely useful and settled a lot of conflict to actively log time spent on split home labor between the two of us.

What I came away with was an understanding that as the woman, my kid's mom was under more pressure to effectively be the queen of the home domain, whereas I didn't feel that pressure. The social pressure led her to continually kind of both underestimate my time and overestimate her own.

So it always seems to me that these surveys have results that would differ if you dropped cameras into 1,000 houses and then meticulously coded all the time spent on any given task.

Simon Kinahan's avatar

Aside from intensive parenting being class-coded, its rational to use high earning potential to work less hours and spend more time on productive activities you enjoy. There's just no conventional way in US work culture to do that. I think many of us took the opportunity presented by work-from-home to sneakily rebalance our working hours and have continued to do so. Outside of companies run by certain notably workaholic public figures, most of Silicon Valley only half completed their return to office initiatives, and decided to be satisfied with only ~60% of staff showing up 3-4 days a week.

28 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?